|
With My Mind on My Money and My Money on My Mind
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
If you were Google, would you want to give blogs a decent chance to rank quicker than old news sites? Let’s say you could even tell the difference between a blog and a splog. Blogs are almost always fresh, relevant content from zealous users who have passion for a topic. It’s almost like news, but not quite.
Newspapers are generally trusted by Google. Let’s consider a few reason why, and lets see if it prevents a few bloggers from whining about why Google let’s newspaper sites rank better, or gives them too much trust.
Here’s a few good reasons newspapers rank better than you
Moral of the story? If a newspaper article is ruling the SERPs on one of your money terms, maybe you need to improve your site. Maybe you can use a few of their strengths to improve your blog.
Bloggers, we have the opportunity to do some big things here, but we can still learn a thing or two from the tried and true content distribution channels. Work a little harder on your site and eventually you will outrank your competition… the New York Times.
Tags: Blogs, Breaking-Stories, Chris Hooley, New-York-Times, Newspaper-Rankings, Professional, SEO, SERPs, Spewspapers, Splogs
I sent my team an email today about how to leverage your research for SEO / marketing value. After reading it, I thought it would actually make a helpful blog post for those who ask lots of questions.
I am in no way implying anybody is dumb, I just thought that title would be nice and catchy for the blog post. Here’s the email I sent out today:
Hi Team,
Often our jobs require that we need to research a topic… software, new info for content development, changes in the advertising landscape, etc. We “Google” things probably a dozen times per person per day in this department. We also ask each other tons of questions, which is great communication.
There is a way however, that we can get the answers we need AND some SEO value (maybe some links, maybe some buzz) from our own curiosity as well. By visiting forums, blogs, question & answer sites (like answers.yahoo.com), and other social media sites, we can create relevant profiles and even have little signatures that have a link back to our site. We can link to our website in our questions too if it makes sense and is not spammy.
Researching this way has a triple benefit. You can get your questions answered by people who are experts or junkies in a certain area (try visiting a software forum for a question about software, they will probably be very passionate about the discussions), you can help brand our company by being a friendly contributor to these communities, AND you even can help our SEO efforts by getting free links back to our site where it makes sense.
I strongly encourage you to try this method of research, since it will help us expand our presence into the social web and may help us for SEO as well. We might even learn some neat new things that we can bring back to our colleagues here :-)
Keep up the good work guys, you rock!
Now that my team is growing, I can imagine these types of emails will be more frequent than things like “Is this project done yet” or “Can you try this font?” or “Please go get my dry cleaning” (kidding!)
Do you think that emails like this, ones that give broad guidance instead of specifics, are an effective way to manage a large team of web marketing managers and professionals? Seems like the higher up you get in an organization, the more it is about vision than specifics.
Tags: Blogs, Chris Hooley, Communities, Dumb, Executive-Management, Forums, Hooley, Marketing, Professional, SEO
Chris Hooley’s -ThinkBait- is powered by WordPress This is copyrighted stuff. You can't steal it unless you are a jerk. If you like it, send traffic to it. |