|
With My Mind on My Money and My Money on My Mind
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
If you were Google, would you want to give blogs a decent chance to rank quicker than old news sites? Let’s say you could even tell the difference between a blog and a splog. Blogs are almost always fresh, relevant content from zealous users who have passion for a topic. It’s almost like news, but not quite.
Newspapers are generally trusted by Google. Let’s consider a few reason why, and lets see if it prevents a few bloggers from whining about why Google let’s newspaper sites rank better, or gives them too much trust.
Here’s a few good reasons newspapers rank better than you
Moral of the story? If a newspaper article is ruling the SERPs on one of your money terms, maybe you need to improve your site. Maybe you can use a few of their strengths to improve your blog.
Bloggers, we have the opportunity to do some big things here, but we can still learn a thing or two from the tried and true content distribution channels. Work a little harder on your site and eventually you will outrank your competition… the New York Times.
Tags: Blogs, Breaking-Stories, Chris Hooley, New-York-Times, Newspaper-Rankings, Professional, SEO, SERPs, Spewspapers, Splogs
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Chris Hooley’s -ThinkBait- is powered by WordPress This is copyrighted stuff. You can't steal it unless you are a jerk. If you like it, send traffic to it. |
Pete Wailes Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 3:47 am
As with a lot of things in SEO, I think a lot of it also comes down to how niche you are. Someone like NYT or the like can shotgun broad areas, but they’re not going to rank well for knitting news. If you deal in a niche area, you should really be being more authoritative than newspapers, if only because you’re doing stuff on that area daily.
Ranking better from there, is a simple case of good SEO. But with many blogs I’d say SEO is over-rated anyway. I’ve always found word of mouth and viral promotions to be far more effective.
markus941 Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 7:07 am
One of the biggest reasons NYT properties don’t rank in niche areas is because their CMS systems are ancient and build like total crap. The sites have tons of uncrawlable (or at least very difficult) URL’s and duplicate content hell. It’s like the systems were purposely built to avoid indexing attempts.
But hey, I’m not complaining ;)
Chris Hooley Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 10:11 am
Doh! I should have done my research before I used that paper as an example!
andrew wee Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:41 pm
Chris,
employing some machiavellian techniques in blogging can give you an edge.
if a newspaper is translating print content to online, a blogger would typically have a 24 hr headstart.
i’d think a blogger’s biggest competition would be the techcrunchs and cnets and boing boing’s of the online world.
if you’re blogging once a day, sure you’d be pummeled.
but if you’re blogging as fastigious as ProBlogger Darren Rowse, you’d stomp a number of the major print and online media (even as a one man show).
rather than do a old school comparison, a cutting edge blogger will need to leverage on web technologies and bust out of the editiorial constraints that old school news media operate under to claim their stake in the online world.
Chris Hooley Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:47 pm
Holy crap Andrew, you are one smart man lol