With My Mind on My Money and My Money on My Mind

 

If you were Google, would you want to give blogs a decent chance to rank quicker than old news sites? Let’s say you could even tell the difference between a blog and a splog. Blogs are almost always fresh, relevant content from zealous users who have passion for a topic. It’s almost like news, but not quite.

Newspapers are generally trusted by Google. Let’s consider a few reason why, and lets see if it prevents a few bloggers from whining about why Google let’s newspaper sites rank better, or gives them too much trust.

Here’s a few good reasons newspapers rank better than you

  • Newspapers have teams of reporters searching for the latest stories, and teams of writers reporting and breaking news. Bloggers are usually a one man show, and often re-report and spin topics recently reported from established news channels.
  • Newspapers have been breaking stories since the dawn of the information age, bloggers just now are tapping into that power.
  • Newspaper stories generally go through rounds of rewriting and editing to insure the content is accurate and perfectly presented. (I’m not suggesting it always comes out that way) They put a LOT of effort into the content. A lot.
  • There are very few spam newspapers (lets call them spewspapers) screwing it up for the legit news sources and confusing robots as to what is real.
  • People quickly link to major news pubs because they generally break stories first, and after years of developing their business and content distribution models, they have developed huge readership that dwarfs any blogger to date.

Moral of the story? If a newspaper article is ruling the SERPs on one of your money terms, maybe you need to improve your site. Maybe you can use a few of their strengths to improve your blog.

  • Create something newsworthy (call it buzz marketing, linkbait, or whatever)
  • Spend more time perfecting your content
  • Write more succinctly and carefully, and edit each post before clicking “publish”
  • Work a littler harder on your distribution channels
  • Remove the clutter, or at least place it in a better spot (and know the difference between clutter, and buzz, and fun)
  • Be an ancient domain with hundreds of thousands of backlinks :-p

Bloggers, we have the opportunity to do some big things here, but we can still learn a thing or two from the tried and true content distribution channels. Work a little harder on your site and eventually you will outrank your competition… the New York Times.


Share and Enjoy: save to del.icio.us submit to digg furl this submit to ma.gnolia submit to RawSugar Add the BlinkList NetVous NewsVine Yahoo! MyWeb


You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Why Newspapers Rank Better than Your Crappy Blog”

  1. See my profile on MyBlogLog.com!
    Pete Wailes Says:

    As with a lot of things in SEO, I think a lot of it also comes down to how niche you are. Someone like NYT or the like can shotgun broad areas, but they’re not going to rank well for knitting news. If you deal in a niche area, you should really be being more authoritative than newspapers, if only because you’re doing stuff on that area daily.

    Ranking better from there, is a simple case of good SEO. But with many blogs I’d say SEO is over-rated anyway. I’ve always found word of mouth and viral promotions to be far more effective.

  2. See my profile on MyBlogLog.com!
    markus941 Says:

    One of the biggest reasons NYT properties don’t rank in niche areas is because their CMS systems are ancient and build like total crap. The sites have tons of uncrawlable (or at least very difficult) URL’s and duplicate content hell. It’s like the systems were purposely built to avoid indexing attempts.

    But hey, I’m not complaining ;)

  3. See my profile on MyBlogLog.com!
    Chris Hooley Says:

    Doh! I should have done my research before I used that paper as an example!

  4. See my profile on MyBlogLog.com!
    andrew wee Says:

    Chris,
    employing some machiavellian techniques in blogging can give you an edge.

    if a newspaper is translating print content to online, a blogger would typically have a 24 hr headstart.

    i’d think a blogger’s biggest competition would be the techcrunchs and cnets and boing boing’s of the online world.

    if you’re blogging once a day, sure you’d be pummeled.

    but if you’re blogging as fastigious as ProBlogger Darren Rowse, you’d stomp a number of the major print and online media (even as a one man show).

    rather than do a old school comparison, a cutting edge blogger will need to leverage on web technologies and bust out of the editiorial constraints that old school news media operate under to claim their stake in the online world.

  5. See my profile on MyBlogLog.com!
    Chris Hooley Says:

    Holy crap Andrew, you are one smart man lol

Leave a Reply




Chris Hooley’s -ThinkBait- is powered by WordPress
This is copyrighted stuff. You can't steal it unless you are a jerk. If you like it, send traffic to it.